Übersetzung für "inmate's request to encumber disburse funds " (Englisch → Französisch) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 122 Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) : With respect to the federal funding for Child Advocacy Centres announced in October 2010: (a) does the funding for this initiative come from an existing fund or is it a new initiative with new funding; (b) what are the criteria by which applications to receive funding under this initiative will be evaluated; (c) how many applications for funding under this initiative have been received, broken down by month received, location of project and name of applicant; (d) how many applications for funding under this ...[+++] initiative have been approved, broken down by date approved, location of project and name of applicant; (e) how many applications for funding under this initiative have been rejected, broken down by date rejected, location of project and name of applicant; (f) is there a prescribed limit to the amount of funds that can be disbursed under this initiative within a single fiscal year; (g) is there a prescribed limit to the amount of funds that can be disbursed to a single applicant or project; (h) what happens to this initiative once the $5.25 million has been fully assigned; (i) what will happen to the funding once the five year commitment comes to an end; (j) what factors or circumstances changed between the time of the requests made by former Victims Ombudsman Steve Sullivan to include funding for Child Advocacy Centres in Budget 2009 and Budget 2010 and the time the government announced funding in October 2010; (k) what existing programs or initiatives may have their funding or potential funding reduced or eliminated as a result of the announced funding for Child Advocacy Centres; (l) what specific branch, department or agency is responsible for administering the funding for Child Advocacy Centres; and (m) what is the legislative basis for this funding?

(Return tabled) Question No. 461 Ms. Joyce Murray: With regard to the Recreational Infrastructure Canada program (RINC), since May 2009 to present: (a) for each of the 308 ridings, how many (i) projects have been approved, (ii) projects have been rejected, (iii) applications for projects have been submitted; (b) where was each approved project located and how much money did it receive from the program, broken down by province and riding; (c) what is the average amount of money allotted to approved projects; (d) for each of the rejected project applications, (i) where was the rejected project to be located, (ii) what was the total funding requested, (iii) wh ...[+++]at was the rationale for the rejection; (e) for approved projects, what is the average number of days from the start date of the project to (i) the date of disbursement of funds, (ii) the date the project was first publicly announced; (f) what is the average number of days between a project receiving approval and the signing of the contribution agreement; (g) what is the total cost of administering the RINC; and (h) how much funding remains (i) unallocated, (ii) undisbursed?

10. Regrets, however, that the funds earmarked for the Baltic Sea Strategy have not yet been disbursed by the Commission; reminds the Commission, therefore, of the importance of ensuring that the funds are disbursed and used in line with the European Parliament’s requests;

92. Requests the Commission and the general secretariat of the Council to send all further progress reports on the implementation of the EU strategy for Africa also to the European Parliament; also requests information on the disbursement and implementation of the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF allocated to the ‘governance initiatives' developed by the Commission for each ACP country;

21. Recalls its recommendation to the Council of 24 September 2003 on the situation in Iraq and its resolution of 6 July 2005 on "The European Union and Iraq – A Framework for Engagement" , which request that EC funds for reconstruction in Iraq be managed by the UN; criticises the Commission for accepting that a considerable share of the Community contribution be managed by the World Bank; notes that appropriations granted under the 2004 and 2005 budgets have only marginally been absorbed by the Bank and on this basis takes the view ...[+++] that no further funding will be required by the Bank during 2006; reminds the Commission that the World Bank relies on the Iraqi authorities for the implementation of its programmes; points out in this respect the weak administrative structure and repeated instances of corruption in Iraq; requests therefore that no further funding be channelled to the World Bank and that other European intermediaries be considered for the disbursement of these funds; calls on the Commission to carry out during 2006 an independent audit on the use of EC funds by the UN and the World Bank;

Hon. Dan Hays (Deputy Leader of the Government): Honourable senators, I have a response to a question of March 21, 2000, from Senator Angus regarding job creation and possible mismanagement of funds, request for statistics on jobs created; a response to a question of April 6, 2000, by Senator Stratton regarding the growth of the Employment Insurance Fund, disbursement of surplus funds; a response to questions of May 17, 2000, by Senator Lynch-Staunton and Senator Roberge ...[+++] regarding the data bank on details of private citizens, verification of accuracy of information and availability of information to other departments; a response to a question of June 15, 2000, by Senator Roche regarding Canada's participation in removal of anti-personnel mines from Kosovo; a response to a question of June 19, 2000 by Senator Roche regarding financial support for lawsuits by former students of residential schools.