Übersetzung für "kommission ergebnisse " (Deutsch → Englisch) :

UN technical commission [ UN Commission for Social Development | UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice | UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs | UN Commission on Population and Development | UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development | UN Commission on Sustainable Development | UN Commission on the Status of Women | UNFF | UN Forum on Forests | United Nations Commission for Social Development | United Nations Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice | United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs | United Nations Commission on Population and Development | United Nations Commission on Science and Technolog ...[+++]y for Development | United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development | United Nations Commission on the Status of Women | United Nations Forum on Forests | United Nations Statistical Commission | United Nations technical commission | UN Statistical Commission ]

European Commission [ CEC | Commission of the European Communities | EC Commission | EU Commission ]

Programme on the dissemination and utilisation of research results | Specific Programme for the dissemination and utilisation of scientific and technological research results | VALUE [Abbr.]

Dissemination and optimization of results | dissemination and optimization of the results

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements | International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements | International Committee for Radiological Units | International X-Ray Unit Committee | ICRU [Abbr.]

proposal (EU) [ amended Commission proposal | Commission proposal | EC proposal | modified proposal | pending proposal ]

Federal Commission for Designations of Origin and Geographical Indications

results of the championship

give information on chiropractic treatment outcomes | present outocomes of chiropractic treatment | provide information on chiropractic treatment outcomes | provide information on chiropractic treatment's outcomes

2. Where a participant that has received Union funding intends not to protect results generated by it for reasons other than impossibility under Union or national law or the lack of potential for commercial or industrial exploitation, and unless the participant intends to transfer them to another legal entity established in a Member State or associated country in view of their protection, it shall inform the Commission or the relevant funding body before any dissemination relating to those results takes place. The Commission, on behalf of the Union, or the relevant funding body may, with the consent of the participant concerned, assume o ...[+++]wnership of those results and take the necessary steps for their adequate protection.

The Commission recognises that these results cannot be considered representative in the way that survey results based on a scientifically selected sample can. The Commission proposes to conduct another survey in 2003, both to test the reliability of the results of the open questionnaire and to establish a yardstick against which to measure the evolution of various views or indicators in the future.

3. Where a participant that has received Union funding intends to abandon the protection of results or intends not to seek the extension of such protection for reasons other than the lack of potential for commercial or industrial exploitation within a period that shall not exceed five years following the payment of the balance, it shall inform the Commission or the relevant funding body, which may continue or extend protection by assuming ownership thereof.

To make future regulation fit with the ”Think Small First” principle, the Commission: is strengthening the assessment of the respect of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in forthcoming legislative and administrative initiatives will, wherever practical, use common commencement dates for regulations and decisions affecting business and publish an annual statement of such legislation entering into force the Commission will, and the Member States are invited to: ensure that policy results are delivered while minimising costs and burdens for business, including by using a smart mix of tools ...[+++] such as mutual recognition and self- or co-regulation, to achieve policy outcomes rigorously assess the impact of forthcoming legislative and administrative initiatives on SMEs (“SME test”) and take relevant results into account when designing proposals consult stakeholders, including SME organisations for at least 8 weeks prior to making any legislative or administrative proposal that has an impact on businesses use specific measures for small and micro-enterprises, such as derogations, transition periods and exemptions, in particular from information or reporting requirements, and other tailor-made approaches, wherever appropriate, and the Member States are invited to: consider the usefulness of introducing common commencement dates and annual statements of legislation entering into force make use of flexibility provisions aimed at SMEs when implementing EU legislation and avoid “gold-plating” To improve the regulatory environment in view of the “Think Small First” principle, the Commission: will come forward with all the proposals to reduce the administrative burden on business which are necessary to achieve the EU reduction target of 25% by 2012 will complete by the end of 2008 a complete screening of the acquis and include the results in the updated simplification rolling programme to be presented in early 2009.