Übersetzung für "Direct final trunk group " (Englisch → Französisch) :

There is, first of all, the Corporation de recherche et d'action sur les maladies héréditaires (Research and action group for hereditary illnesses), the CORAMH, chaired by Dr. Daniel Gaudet; the Groupe de recherche et d'intervention sur les dyslipidémies, le diabète et l'arthérosclérose (Research and intervention group for lipidosis, diabetes and arteriosclerosis) at the Saguenay Hospital Centre, also under the direction of Dr. Daniel Gaudet; there is the Clinique des maladies neuromusculaires (Neuromuscular disorders clinic), chair ...[+++]ed by Dr. Jean Mathieu; the Institut interuniversitaire de recherches sur les populations (Interuniversity institute on population research), the IREP, which has been chaired for a long time by Dr. Gérard Bouchard of the University of Quebec in Chicoutimi; the Groupe de recherche en génétique et éthique du Québec (Genetics and ethics research group of Quebec), chaired by Dr. Melançon, who will be speaking to you today, and, finally, the Groupe d'étude des conditions de vie et des besoins de la population (Research group on living conditions and population needs) which I have chaired since 1982, and which is located at the Jonquière Cégep.

Finally, in relation to the amendments to the Canada Evidence Act and the Criminal Code, while NCARR is not directly involved in issues concerning persons with disabilities, we are nevertheless supportive of the amendments to accommodate the special needs of this group and, indeed, of all disadvantaged groups in our society.

(Return tabled) Question No. 333 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the government’s consultations about prostitution-related offences: (a) what goals have been established for the consultations; (b) what goals have been established for the online consultation; (c) whose input did the government seek through online consultation; (d) which individuals wrote the discussion paper for the online consultation; (e) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences participated in the development of the discussion paper in (d); (f) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (g) which individuals with legal expertise participated in the development of the discussion p ...[+++]aper in (d); (h) which individuals with legal expertise reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (i) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics participated in the development of the discussion paper in (d); (j) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (k) which individuals developed the online consultation questions; (l) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (m) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences reviewed the online consultation questions; (n) which individuals with legal expertise participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (o) which individuals with legal expertise reviewed the online consultation questions; (p) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (q) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics reviewed the online consultation questions; (r) how many responses did the government receive through the online form; (s) how many responses were sent directly to ...

Finally, the agreement reached in the Code of Conduct Group for Member States to take a coordinated approach can only be applied after an amendment to the Parent-Subsidiary directive which Member States cannot do without a proposal from the Commission.

In order to simplify type-approval legislation in line with the recommendations contained in the final report of the CARS 21 High Level Group, it is appropriate to repeal several Directives without reducing the level of protection of road users.

These include: - discussions with its two consultative groups (the Payments Systems Technical Development Group and the Payment Systems Users Liaison Group) on the ways in which the payment systems can best be prepared for the introduction of the Ecu - rapid progress, in the framework of an existing Task Force of government experts, on harmonising procedures for reporting cross- border credit transfers for the purposes of compiling balance of payments statistics (the Commission wants transactions below 10,000 Ecus exempted) - continuing discussions with Member State legal experts, central bank representatives and the EMI on harmonising t ...[+++]he legal framework for cross-border payments, in particular settlement finality for credit transfers (a Directive on settlement finality could be proposed in 1995) - maintaining contact with interested parties on the establishment of linkages between automatic clearing houses (ACHs, which process payments transfers at the national level) to assess how best to contribute to progress in this area - consulting with the Commission's two consultative groups on the results of an independent study to be completed in June 1995 on the information given to customers when using payment cards for cross-border payments (so-called face-to-face payments), and assessing the appropriate follow-up measures - launching a study on the regulatory implications for the EU of the use of pre-paid payment cards, particularly as regards the stability of the banking system, consumer protection and the promotion of interoperable cross-border banking services.