Übersetzung für "Possess jurisdiction " (Englisch → Französisch) :

have jurisdiction [ exercise jurisdiction | possess jurisdiction ]

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

jurisdiction [ exclusive jurisdiction | jurisdiction of the courts | jurisdiction of the ordinary courts | legal jurisdiction | Competence of tribunals(ECLAS) ]

subject-matter jurisdiction [ jurisdiction of the subject matter | jurisdiction of the cause | jurisdiction over the action | jurisdiction ratione materiae | jurisdiction over the subject matter | monetary jurisdiction | competence as to subject matter | ratione materiae jurisdiction | absolute juris ]

actual possession | de facto possession | possession in deed | possession in fact | real possession

personal jurisdiction [ jurisdiction over the person | jurisdiction ratione personae | in personam jurisdiction | jurisdiction in personam | jurisdiction of the person ]

competence in relation to the subject matter | jurisdiction in relation to the subject matter | jurisdiction ratione materiae | jurisdiction related to subject matter | material competence | subject-matter competence | subject-matter jurisdiction

jurisdiction ratione materiae [ subject-matter jurisdiction ]

Trance and possession disorders

conflict of jurisdiction [ conflict of prerogatives ]

The new rules make it a self-standing offence to possess, sell, procure for use, import or distribute a stolen or unlawfully appropriated counterfeited or falsified payment instrument; Clarifying the scope of the jurisdiction by ensuring that Member States have jurisdiction in cases either where the offence has been committed using an information system located within the territory of the Member State while the offender may be located outside of it or if the offender is located within the territory of the Member State but the informa ...[+++]tion system may be located outside of it.

If the self-certification indicates that the Account Holder is resident in a Reportable Jurisdiction, the Reporting Financial Institution must treat the account as a Reportable Account unless it reasonably determines based on information in its possession or that is publicly available, that the Account Holder is not a Reportable Person with respect to such Reportable Jurisdiction.

for custody tasks referred to in point (a) of paragraph 8, the third party is subject to effective prudential regulation, including minimum capital requirements, and supervision in the jurisdiction concerned and the third party is subject to an external periodic audit to ensure that the financial instruments are in its possession.

(ii)for custody tasks referred to in point (a) of paragraph 8, the third party is subject to effective prudential regulation, including minimum capital requirements, and supervision in the jurisdiction concerned and the third party is subject to an external periodic audit to ensure that the financial instruments are in its possession.