Übersetzung für "Refuting evidence " (Englisch → Französisch) :

rebutting evidence | refuting evidence

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

autoptic evidence | demonstrative evidence | mathematical evidence | objective evidence | objective fact evidence | real evidence | tangible evidence | tangible exhibit

weight of evidence | weight of evidence approach | weight-of-evidence | weight-of-evidence analysis | weight-of-the-evidence analysis | WOE [Abbr.]

evidence-based radiography methods | evidence-based radiography process | evidence-based radiography practice | evidence-based radiography praxis

evidence-based approach in primary care | evidence-based medicine in general practice | evidence-based approach in general practice | evidence-based approach in medical care

Definition: Dissociative stupor is diagnosed on the basis of a profound diminution or absence of voluntary movement and normal responsiveness to external stimuli such as light, noise, and touch, but examination and investigation reveal no evidence of a physical cause. In addition, there is positive evidence of psychogenic causation in the form of recent stressful events or problems.

The association of four anomalies: intellectual deficit, microcephaly, palate anomalies and ocular abnormalities. It has been described in five patients (three boys and two girls). The clinical manifestations are evident from birth. The palate anomal

administer evidence | utilise evidence | handle evidence | handle testimonies

Definition: A disorder characterized by impairment of memory, learning difficulties, and reduced ability to concentrate on a task for more than brief periods. There is often a marked feeling of mental fatigue when mental tasks are attempted, and new learning is found to be subjectively difficult even when objectively successful. None of these symptoms is so severe that a diagnosis of either dementia (F00-F03) or delirium (F05.-) can be made. This diagnosis should be made only in association with a specified physical disorder, and should not be made in the presence of any of the mental or behavioural disorders classified to F10-F99. The d ...[+++]isorder may precede, accompany, or follow a wide variety of infections and physical disorders, both cerebral and systemic, but direct evidence of cerebral involvement is not necessarily present. It can be differentiated from postencephalitic syndrome (F07.1) and postconcussional syndrome (F07.2) by its different etiology, more restricted range of generally milder symptoms, and usually shorter duration.

The eight third countries concerned were given the opportunity to respond in writing to issues explicitly indicated in the Decision of 15 November 2012 as well as to other relevant information, allowing them to submit evidence in order to refute or complete the facts invoked in the Decision of 15 November 2012 or to adopt, as appropriate, a plan of action to improve and measures taken to rectify the situation.

One can find evidence both supporting and refuting the commentary, and increasingly refuting that this is in fact the issue.

We can see a lot of international communities taking great pleasure in the enactment of this law because it allows those other countries to manipulate the Canadian system—a Canadian system of government and a Canadian court system—by providing evidence that cannot be tested or refuted as the opportunity for testing or refutation has not been provided.

One can find evidence both supporting and refuting the commentary, and increasingly refuting that this is in fact the issue.