Übersetzung für "excessive administrative costs " (Englisch → Französisch) :

excess commuting cost

excess capital cost allowance

BAT not entailing excessive costs | best available techniques not entailing excessive cost | best available technology not entailing excessive cost | Batnec [Abbr.] | Batneec [Abbr.]

administrative formalities [ administrative burden | administrative cost | administrative simplification | bureaucracy | cost of administration | cost of administrative formalities | simplification of administrative formalities | Bureaucracy(STW) | bureaucracy(UNBIS) ]

selling, general and administrative costs | selling, general and administrative expenses | SG&A costs [Abbr.] | SGA expenses [Abbr.]

overheads [ administrative expenses | entertainment expenses | financial expenses | general expenses | oncost | overhead cost | running costs ]

profitability index | benefit/cost ratio | excess present value index

Zero Administration | Zero Administration for Windows | Zero Administration Cost | ZAW | Zero Administration Workstation

At present, cross-border activities of companies give rise to numerous cases of discrimination, double taxation, excessive administrative costs owing to complicated administrative procedures and delays in tax refunds.

When the vested pension rights or the value of the vested pension rights of an outgoing worker do not exceed an applicable threshold established by the Member State concerned, and in order to avoid excessive administrative costs resulting from the management of a large number of low-value dormant pension rights, pension schemes may be given the option not to preserve those vested rights but, instead, to pay the outgoing worker a capital sum equivalent to the value of the vested pension rights.

Notes that energy reporting obligations as part of a framework are essential to evaluate the progress and implementation of existing energy efficiency legislation; regrets, however, the excessive energy reporting obligations imposed, also by gold-plating by Member States, on businesses, energy producers, consumers and public authorities, which limit the potential for growth and innovation; stresses that reporting duties should wherever possible be simplified in order to reduce administrative burdens and costs ...[+++]; criticises the fact that data obtained in reporting are often not comparable across the EU due to different breakdowns, methodologies and standards; calls on the Commission to reduce, including through digital solutions, the administrative burden related to reporting obligations and to establish more guidelines on data comparability for better data evaluation; calls for aligning energy demand projections in line with cost-effective saving potential in key sectors, and believes that cutting red tape will speed up the implementation of energy efficiency measures; notes that applying the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle requires reviewing energy planning and reporting and improving policy coherence in order to ensure their mutual reinforcement, recognising that saving energy is Europe’s first and most secure source of energy; notes that energy efficiency can be the best energy ‘source’ investment, improving affordability of energy, driving down the need for additional and costly supply-side infrastructure and helping tackle climate change.

But technical and administrative hurdles still persist, creating excessive administrative costs and market access barriers, especially for new entrants and rail vehicle manufacturers.