Übersetzung für "lack jurisdiction " (Englisch → Französisch) :

extent to which the court seised clearly lacks jurisdiction

lack of jurisdiction [ want of jurisdiction | failure of jurisdiction ]

clear lack of jurisdiction | clear that the Court has no jurisdiction

plea against the jurisdiction | plea of lack of jurisdiction

complete lack of jurisdiction of a court

jurisdiction [ exclusive jurisdiction | jurisdiction of the courts | jurisdiction of the ordinary courts | legal jurisdiction | Competence of tribunals(ECLAS) ]

conflict of jurisdiction | conflict of jurisdictions | jurisdictional conflict | conflict of law | conflict of laws

Industrial property litigation is one of the areas where parties have attempted to pre-empt the exercise of jurisdiction by a competent court by starting proceedings before another court which usually, though not always, lacks jurisdiction, preferably in a State where the proceedings to decide on the jurisdiction issue and/or on the merits take a long time.

equal to or below the 0,5 % threshold, provided that the group data reporting agent meets certain quantitative or qualitative criteria that attest to its importance for the stability and functioning of the financial system in the euro area, e.g. by virtue of its interconnectedness with other financial institutions in the euro area, cross-jurisdictional activity, lack of substitutability, complexity of the corporate structure, or direct supervision by the ECB; and/or individual euro area Member States, e.g. by virtue of the relative importance of the group data reporting agent within a particular segment of the banking services market in ...[+++] one or more euro area Member States, or direct supervision by the ECB’.

With respect to the exclusive jurisdiction in the area of company law, questions arise on the scope of the exclusive jurisdiction rule and the lack of uniform definition of the notion of "seat" of a company, leading to possible positive and negative conflicts of jurisdiction.

76. Stresses that tax competition is far from being limited to the Member States, including their dependent or associated territories, and that most practices under consideration have an international dimension, through the shifting of profits to low- or no-tax or secrecy jurisdictions where, often, no substantial economic activity takes place; deplores the lack of a coordinated approach on the part of the Member States vis-à-vis all those jurisdictions, not only in terms of joint action or reaction against their harmful practices, b ...[+++]ut also, despite the Commission’s efforts, regarding their identification and the relevant criteria; strongly supports, therefore, the Commission’s 2012 proposal, which includes substantial criteria for ensuring fair competition in addition to transparency and the exchange of information, as well as the recent publication, in the Commission’s tax package of 17 June 2015, of a list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions, established following a ‘common denominator’ approach on the basis of lists existing at national level; stresses that the establishment of such a list is a prerequisite for taking appropriate action against such jurisdictions; believes that this list should be the first iteration of a process that results in a rigorous, objective definition of ‘tax havens’ which can then inform future lists, established on the basis of clear criteria that should be known in advance; encourages the Commission to assess whether European jurisdictions comply with these criteria;