Übersetzung für "new oil reference price program " (Englisch → Französisch) :

(m) in the case of conventional new oil revenues referred to in paragraph (m) of that definition, revenues derived by a province – other than those described in paragraphs (o) and (p) – that are attributable to new oil that is from hydrocarbon deposits in the province, including revenues derived from

Question No. 140 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to development of the oil sands, its impacts on the environment and surrounding communities, and the economic effects of these impacts: (a) what, if any, steps has the government taken to establish air emission limits or air quality standards to achieve the World Health Organization’s Air Quality Guidelines to protect air quality and human health; (b) what, if any, steps has the government’s sector-by-sector approach taken to regulate carbon emissions in the oil sands to ensure the oil sands industry makes appropriate reductions in its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to contribute to Canada’s GHG emission reduction goal of 17% be ...[+++]low the 2005 level; (c) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine the effect of the oil sands expansion on (i) GHG emissions, (ii) Canada’s ability to meet its GHG emission reduction goals, (iii) Canada’s contribution to the goal of staying below a 2°C increase in global average surface temperature, relative to the pre-industrial level, as articulated at the G8 meeting in L’Aquila, Italy and at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations through the Copenhagen Accord in December 2009 and the Cancun Agreements in December 2010, (iv) the full suite of sustainability criteria, including environmental, economic and social sustainability, and (v) what were the results of any studies identified in (c)(i), (c)(ii), (c)(iii), and (c)(iv); (d) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine (i) the scope of oil sands expansion if the oil sands sector is not required to deliver its proportional share of GHG reductions, (ii) the impacts such a decision would have on other sectors’ allowable GHG emissions, (iii) whether other sectors of the Canadian economy would have to do more than their proportional share to reduce emissions, (iv) what were the results of any studies identified in (d)(i), (d)(ii), and (d)(iii); (e) what, if any, studies ...

This amount is mainly attributable to $5.5 billion in the forecast for the consolidated specified purpose accounts; $192 million more for Old Age Security benefits; and $228 million less for Guaranteed Income Supplements, both based on updated population and average monthly rate forecasts; $125 million for the AgriInsurance program based on higher crop values and an increase in the number of acres covered; $78 million for the AgriStability program driven primarily by declining grain and oil seed prices in 2009, which affected the ...[+++]value of inventories; $465.3 million for Newfoundland and Labrador in the form of fiscal equalization offset payments; a decrease of $640.8 million in payments to the Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund due to a decline in crude oil prices, increased costs and a temporary reduction in production levels associated with the expansion of the White Rose project; and a total decrease of $1.4 billion to projected infrastructure payments under various initiatives, including the communities component of the Building Canada Fund, the establishment of the Green Infrastructure Fund, provincial-territorial infrastructure-based funding, and funding to support the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund.

The second subparagraph of this paragraph may not apply for the transition from the Leader Community Initiative to the Leader Axis of the new programming period where the integrated local development strategies, to be implemented by local action groups referred to in Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 which are selected for the new programming period, are new and/or the same rural territory has not benefited from the Leader Community Initiative.

2. Expenditure under the current programming period incurred by the final date of eligibility for expenditure of that programming period and relating to operations covered by the first indent of point 2.1 and by point 3 of Rule No 11 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000, including ex ante evaluations referred to in Article 85 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, for the preparation of rural development programmes under the new programming period, shall be, subject to the conditions laid down in points 2.2 to 2.7 and 3 of that Rule ...[+++], eligible under the technical assistance component in the current operational programmes or rural development programming documents.

The government could have supported job creation in the Maritimes and used this money to give Canada a technological edge in this field on international markets instead of trying to look for new oil in difficult conditions at the cost of human lives, on drilling platforms off-shore-new oil at well above the price on world markets.