The factual situation in that case was that a newspaper had printed an article alleging that there had been a leak of the budget, that a member of Parliament had given that information to a business person, presumably the concept being that the business person benefited financially.
La situation, dans ce cas, c’est qu’un journal avait publié un article alléguant qu’il y avait eu une fuite d’information relative au budget, qu’un député avait communiqué cette information à un homme d’affaires et que celui-ci en avait retiré des avantages financiers.