Übersetzung für "transport projects " (Englisch → Französisch) :

50. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and local authorities to make use of the new possibility of financing urban projects within the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) in urban nodes; recalls the possibility for the CEF to finance synergy projects with an extra-cofinancing rate of transport projects with energy and telecommunications, which has enormous potential for urban projects; invites the Commission to consider appropriate EU funding for sustainable mobility projects when reviewing the budgets of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund; asks the relevant authorities to ensure there is a strong relati ...[+++]onship between smart and sustainable urban mobility policy and urban mobility projects financed by EU funds, and to set clear utilisation targets and indicators in order to avoid under-utilisation of the projects and undermining of their economic and social benefits; recognises the need for new forms of sustainable funding for public transport which enable environmental sustainability, digitalisation and accessibility, stimulate the economy of urban areas and create new jobs;

50. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and local authorities to make use of the new possibility of financing urban projects within the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) in urban nodes; recalls the possibility for the CEF to finance synergy projects with an extra-cofinancing rate of transport projects with energy and telecommunications, which has enormous potential for urban projects; invites the Commission to consider appropriate EU funding for sustainable mobility projects when reviewing the budgets of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund; asks the relevant authorities to ensure there is a strong relati ...[+++]onship between smart and sustainable urban mobility policy and urban mobility projects financed by EU funds, and to set clear utilisation targets and indicators in order to avoid under-utilisation of the projects and undermining of their economic and social benefits; recognises the need for new forms of sustainable funding for public transport which enable environmental sustainability, digitalisation and accessibility, stimulate the economy of urban areas and create new jobs;

2. Recalls the crucial role that regional policy plays in the adjustment needed for the balanced development of transport in Europe; calls on the EU and the Member States to ensure sufficient funding in their budgetary planning and sufficient project planning and implementation capacities, but not to do so to the detriment of the cohesion policy’s goals and resources; stresses that increased EU cofinancing for infrastructure projects in convergence regions can help improve the absorption of Community support; recalls the Commission’s recommendation to use monies from cohesion policy funds more resource-efficiently and to prioritise transport projects that enha ...[+++]nce sustainability and are part of existing integrated transport strategies; invites Member States to consider that an efficient European transport network requires substantial financing, and that a wide range of sources, public as well as private, are available;

[25] COM(2005) 75: "Feasibility report on EU loan guarantee instrument for TEN-Transport projects"; COM(2005) 76: "Concept for the design of an EU loan guarantee instrument for TEN-Transport projects"; SEC(2005) 323: "Loan guarantee instrument for TEN-Transport projects".

7. Expresses its disappointment, however, at the slow progress made by a number of TEN transport projects, despite the high rate of utilisation of payment appropriations for the budget line for the TEN-Transport programme. In its annual report for 2002, the Court of Auditors pointed out that some of the projects examined that year would have been carried out without the Community's financial assistance; nevertheless, without such European assistance, these projects would not have been completed within the deadlines set out in the TEN-Transport programme. Furthermore, these are important projects which act as a catalyst and driving force ...[+++] for the economy and they should therefore not be delayed, but accelerated as far as possible so as to meet the Lisbon objectives and the aims of the European Growth Initiative;

85. Calls for improvements in the way in which European environmental policy (e.g. the Birds Directive and the Habitat Directive) is coordinated with transport policy, and particularly for the implementation of sustainable transport projects; argues, therefore, for a strategic environmental impact assessment to be carried out on new transport infrastructure projects, weighing up the environmental, economic and social benefits of an infrastructure project against its drawbacks relating to the application of particular environmental directives;