Übersetzung für "Action for money had and received " (Englisch → Deutsch) :

actio de in rem verso | action for money had and received

plea of money had and received

It is appropriate to have rules establishing a methodology for carrying out valuations aimed at determining whether there is any difference between the actual treatment of shareholders and creditors in respect of which resolution action or actions have been effected, and the amount that those shareholders and creditors would have received had the institution or entity as referred to in points (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of Dire ...[+++]ctive 2014/59/EU (‘entity’) been subject to normal insolvency proceedings at the date on which the decision to resolve that entity was adopted according to Article 82 of Directive 2014/59/EU.

4. Recalls that the Joint Undertaking adopted in 2010 an ex-post audit strategy that is a key control for assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and that its implementation started in 2011; notes that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States however the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for those audits; notes furthermore that the Joint Undertaking had not received ...[+++] sufficient information relating to the audit strategies of the NFAs; deplores the fact that no ex-post audits had been carried out by the NFAs on the grants paid up to the end of 2011 and invites the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority on the follow up actions taken;

4. Recalls that the Joint Undertaking adopted an ex post audit strategy in 2010 that is key to assessing the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and that its implementation started in 2011; notes that the audit of project cost claims has been delegated to the National Funding Authorities (NFAs) of the Member States; however the administrative agreements signed with the NFAs do not include the practical arrangements for those audits; notes furthermore that the Joint Undertaking had not received s ...[+++]ufficient information relating to the audit strategies of the NFAs; deplores the fact that no ex post audits had been carried out by the NFAs on the grants paid up to the end of 2011 and invites the Joint Undertaking to inform the discharge authority on the follow up actions taken;

In the present case, it is clear from the documents in the case that the action before the Tribunal was brought within the time-limit of three months laid down in the Staff Regulations, extended on account of distance by a single period of 10 days from the date on which the applicant received notification ...[+++]that the complaint had been rejected; that the applicant challenges the decision regarding his grading on his appointment as a temporary agent, which he regards as adversely affecting him, and that he has a legal interest in bringing proceedings since he is challenging an administrative decision of individual application producing binding legal effects that directly and immediately affect his interests.