Übersetzung für "Head receiving office " (Englisch → Deutsch) :

65. Notes that the Portuguese Presidency followed the German initiatives under the guidelines and instructed all EU diplomatic missions in priority countries to regard the country-specific strategies adopted by COHOM on 15 June 2007 as standing instructions to be incorporated in the work of the Heads of Mission in the area of children in armed conflicts; welcomes the fact that the Presidency-in-office has also forwarded to local Presidencies the reports received by relevant NGOs regarding specific countries; welcomes the Slovenian P ...[+++]residency's initiative in commissioning a study on the impact of EU measures on children affected by armed conflict; stresses in this connection the limited impact the guidelines have on children and armed conflicts, owing in particular to the fact that the majority of the Commission delegations and Member State embassies were not informed that their host country was considered a priority country for the application of these guidelines;

65. Notes that the Portuguese Presidency followed the German initiatives under the guidelines and instructed all missions in priority countries to regard the country-specific strategies adopted by COHOM on 15 June 2007 as standing instructions to be incorporated in the work of the Heads of Missions in the area of children in armed conflicts; welcomes the fact that the Presidency-in-office has also forwarded to local Presidencies the reports received by relevant NGOs regarding specific countries; welcomes the Slovenian Presidency’s i ...[+++]nitiative in commissioning a study on the impact of EU measures on children affected by armed conflict; stresses in this connection the limited impact the guidelines have on children and armed conflicts, owing in particular to the fact that the majority of the Commission and Member State delegations were not informed that their host country was considered a priority country for the application of these guidelines;

29. Rejects the draft memorandum of understanding in which a code of practice for the exchange of information between OLAF and the Commission is set out, because it impinges upon the Regulation currently in force and, therefore, on OLAF's remit; believes that the provisions governing the forwarding of information should perhaps be reviewed in the context of a revised regulation; insists that the notification of OLAF should be enshrined in the Statute pursuant to Article 2 of the standard decision; insists that the head of OLAF should determine the content of the information, taking as criteria the protection of the rights of the perso ...[+++]n concerned, the need for an effective and efficient investigation to be carried out and the need for the EU institutions to be protected against any financial loss in future; calls on the Commission and OLAF to check whether it would be worthwhile to create the post of a legal officer; considers that each EU institution should lay down rules governing the way in which it deals with information received from OLAF, ensuring that it respects these criteria;

(3) The Directive does not establish clearly which Member State's authorities should receive suspicious transaction reports from branches of credit and financial institutions having their head office in another Member State nor which Member State's authorities are responsible for ensuring that such branches comply with the Directive.

(22) Where a credit institution which has its head office outside the Community possesses branches in more than one Member State, each branch should receive individual treatment in regard to the application of this Directive.

To carry out its business, UCITS must receive prior official authorisation granted by the competent authorities in the Member State in which they are located, or their home Member State, i.e. the Member State in which their registered office and head office are situated.