Übersetzung für "freedom decision-making " (Englisch → Deutsch) :

While the Commission accepts that the aims of protecting the environment and the needs of town and country planning are grounds for a public interest that might justify restrictions on the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EC Treaty, it considers that the Spanish rules and the Catalan rules, which put in place a particularly complex and restrictive procedure, much of which is based on considerations of a commercial nature such as the needs of the market and the impact of the new commercial premises on existing traders, which contains insufficiently self-evident and objective criteria and, in so far as concerns the Catalan rules, whi ...[+++]ch allows for participation, albeit indirect, in the decision-making process by representatives of the economic interests already installed, is not justified and not proportional to the public interest objectives pursued.

Implementing the multi-annual programme strengthening Freedom, Security and Justice in the European Union, is a common goal, which imposes effective and democratic accountable decision-making and clear political priorities.

A significant majority of EU25 citizens consider that more decision-making should take place at EU level in the area of Justice, Freedom and Security

While the Commission accepts that the aims of protecting the environment and the needs of town and country planning are grounds for a public interest that might justify restrictions on the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EC Treaty, it considers that the French procedure, much of which is based on considerations of a commercial nature such as the impact of the new shop on existing traders, which contains insufficiently self-evident and objective criteria which have to be assessed by the applicant, and which allows for participation in the decision-making process b ...[+++]y representatives of the economic interests already installed, is not justified and not proportional to the public interest at stake.

66. Considers it necessary for the development of the AFSJ that the draft Constitutional Treaty be adopted , with particular reference to the following main points: (i) incorporating in the text of the draft Constitutional Treaty the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, in order to ensure respect for it in all sectors of the Union's activities; (ii) an end to the pillar structure; (iii) an increase in qualified majority voting and codecision with the European Parliament, as a vital element in strengthening the democratic legitimacy of decisions which, in the field of the AFSJ, have so many and such noticeable repercussions on the life and rights of citizens; (iv) strengthening the Commission's right of initiative, without prejudice t ...[+++]o that of the Member States, in the fields of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters; (v) extending the Community method to judicial cooperation in penal and police matters, thereby making the decision-making process in this sector more democratic and efficient; (vi) the possible creation of the office of European Public Prosecutor, in order to combat Community fraud and other serious crossborder offences; (vii) strengthening the role and involvement of the national parliaments, particularly in monitoring respect for the subsidiarity principle, reciprocal assessment of the implementation of the Union's policies and the parliamentary scrutiny of Europol and Eurojust; (viii) extending the competences of the European Court of Justice; (ix) clarification and definition of the system of fundamental rights in the European Union, not least in relation to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms signed in Rome on 4 November 1950;

With regard to the future of decision-making processes, the Commission welcomes the conclusions reached by the Convention’s working group on Justice and Home Affairs, because it acknowledges that in issues of asylum, immigration and other policies involving freedom of movement, the general rule for decision-making must be to adopt legislative acts under the codecision process, in which the Council reaches agreement by qualified majority.